Topping from the Bottom: How to Recognize It
- T.L. Duncan

- Jan 26
- 3 min read
In any power-exchange dynamic, clarity matters. Roles matter. Intent matters. And one of the most common sources of confusion—especially in newer or poorly negotiated dynamics—is topping from the bottom.
This term gets thrown around casually, often as an insult. That’s a mistake. Understanding what it actually is helps everyone maintain healthier, more intentional dynamics.
Let’s break it down.
What “Topping from the Bottom” Actually Means
Topping from the bottom happens when a submissive attempts to control, direct, or manipulate the dynamic while still claiming the submissive role.
This is not about:
Having needs
Asking questions
Advocating for safety
Giving feedback when invited
It is about attempting to steer authority without owning it.
In short:👉 It’s influence without accountability.
Common Signs of Topping from the Bottom
Here are some of the most frequent patterns.
1. Conditional Obedience
“I’ll do it… but only if you do it this way.”
A submissive is always allowed preferences—but when compliance becomes a negotiation every time, authority is being quietly undermined.
2. Scripted Dominance
They correct the Dominant on:
How scenes “should” go
What protocols are “right”
How a Dominant is “supposed” to act
This often sounds like education, but feels like control.
A Dominant may invite input. That’s different.
3. Emotional Leverage
Statements like:
“I guess I don’t matter then.”
“Other Dominants would understand me.”
“If you really cared, you’d do it my way.”
This is manipulation wrapped in vulnerability.
4. Passive Resistance
Agreeing outwardly while:

Delaying tasks
“Forgetting” expectations
Doing the bare minimum
This is quiet defiance disguised as submission.
5. Attention-Seeking Through Crisis
Repeated emotional spirals that:
Appear only when structure is enforced
Coincide with accountability moments
Magically resolve once focus returns
This is a power grab, not a need.
What Topping from the Bottom Is Not
It’s important to be precise.
Topping from the bottom is not:
Asking for aftercare
Using safewords
Saying “no” to a limit
Offering feedback when invited
Advocating for health, safety, or consent
Submission does not mean silence or self-erasure.
Why It Happens
Most of the time, this behavior isn’t malicious.
Common root causes include:
Fear of vulnerability
Insecurity about surrender
Past dynamics where control felt unsafe
Confusion between fantasy and real authority
Understanding the why helps address the behavior—but it does not excuse it.
Why It’s a Problem in Power Exchange
Unchecked topping from the bottom:
Erodes trust
Exhausts Dominants
Creates resentment on both sides
Turns dominance into performance instead of authority
A Dominant who must constantly defend their role is no longer leading.
How Dominants Can Address It
Name the behavior calmly
Not as an accusation, but as an observation.
Re-anchor the structure
Revisit agreements, protocols, and expectations.
Require accountability
Submission without responsibility isn’t submission.
Decide if the dynamic is still aligned
Not every mismatch needs to be “fixed.”
How Submissives Can Self-Check
Ask yourself:
Am I trying to feel safe, or am I trying to feel in control?
Am I offering input—or attempting to steer outcomes?
Would I still want this dynamic if I wasn’t directing it?
True submission is not passive—but it is honest.
Final Thought
Topping from the bottom isn’t a moral failure. It’s a misalignment of power, intent, and communication.
When everyone owns their role—fully and responsibly—the dynamic becomes cleaner, stronger, and far more satisfying.
Authority works best when it’s clear.
So does submission.



Comments